The Role of Historical Elements in Explaining the Principle of Imamate

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12565184

Keywords:

Shi'a Teachings, Historical Context, Scripture and Tradition, Political Elements, Social Components, Cultural Framework, Economic Factors, Intellectual Currents, Imamate Presence, Quranic Foundations, Epistemological Framework, Theoretical Foundations

Abstract

The presentation and elucidation of profound Shi'a teachings, deeply rooted in scripture and tradition, necessitate a conducive environment. The realization of such an environment is inextricably linked to the alignment or misalignment of influential historical elements, namely the political, social, cultural, and economic components.

To accurately analyze phenomena within their historical context, it is imperative to recognise and utilize the historical elements that have shaped those events. The term "Historical element" refers to any incident or minor component within the broader social, cultural, political, and occasionally economic framework that has played a role in shaping a particular intellectual current throughout history. Without considering the entirety of these components and their degree of alignment or misalignment, disregarding the influence of the unseen and divine realm in comprehending religious content, the analysis of any phenomenon remains incomplete.

A thoughtful examination of these elements underscores their impact on the process of presenting the Shi'a epistemological framework, both in summary and in detail, during various periods of imamate presence without altering its fundamental principles.

This study endeavors to explore three primary discussions: first, the theoretical and Quranic foundations and the question of why a summary and detailed explanation are necessary; second, outlining how historical elements play a role; and third, presenting comparative examples within the summary and detailed framework. The second section aims to elucidate these aspects, thereby enabling a comparative discussion of the explanation of epistemological teachings.



References

Qaramaleki, Ahad, Methodology of Religious Studies, 8–27.

Ibn Abi al-Hadid, Abdul Hamid ibn Hibat Allah, Sharh Nahj al-Balaghah, 3/15.

Ibn al-Athir, Ali ibn Abi al-Karam, Al-Kamil fi al-Tarikh, 3/477.

Jahiz, Amr ibn Bahr, Al-Rasa'il al-Siyasiyyah, 297.

Ibid., Al-Bayan wa al-Tabyin, 1/167.

Ibn Hajar, Ahmad ibn Ali, Tahdhib al-Tahdhib, 2/211.

Kulayni, Muhammad ibn Ya'qub, Al-Kafi, 1/351.

Saduq, Muhammad ibn Ali, Uyun Akhbar al-Rida (PBUH), 2/170.

Ibn Shahr Ashub, Muhammad, Manaqib Aal Abi Talib (PBUH), 4/89.

Abu al-Faraj, Ali ibn al-Husayn, Al-Aghani, 381.

Manqari, Nasr ibn Muzahim, Waq'at Siffin, 355.

Ibn Asakir, Ali ibn al-Hasan, Tarikh Madinat Dimashq, 42/438.

Ibn al-Athir, Ali ibn Abi al-Karam, ibid., 3/477.

Ibn Kathir, Ismail, Al-Bidayah wa al-Nihayah, 8/42; Ibn Asakir, Ali ibn al-Hasan, ibid., 13/248; Waqidi, Muhammad ibn Sa'd, Al-Tabaqat al-Kubra, 10/319.

Kashshi, Muhammad ibn Umar, Rijal al-Kashshi, 266.

Kulayni, Muhammad ibn Ya'qub, ibid., 2/224.

Ibid., 3/235.

Ibid., 2/20; for examples of its social effects, see Kashshi, Muhammad ibn Umar, ibid., 163.

Najashi, Ahmad ibn Ali, Rijal al-Najashi, 10.

Kashshi, Muhammad ibn Umar, 137; Mufid, Muhammad ibn Muhammad, Al-Ikhtisas, 66.

Kashshi, Muhammad ibn Umar, ibid., 109.

Kulayni, Muhammad ibn Ya'qub, ibid., 5/362.

Ibid., 1/262.

Ibid., 3/274.

Mufid, Muhammad ibn Muhammad, ibid., 235.

Valavi, Ali Muhammad et al., Relations of Umayyad Caliphs with Dhimmi Christians and Their Role in the Progress of Muslim Sciences, Tarikh dar Ayeneh Pezhueh, Autumn 1389, Issue 27.

Ibid.

Najashi, Ahmad ibn Ali, ibid., 433.

Baghdadi, Ibn al-Nadim, Fihrist Ibn al-Nadim, 303.

For more information, see: Sami, Ali, The Efforts of Iranian Scientists and Translators in Translating Books into Arabic during the Umayyad and Abbasid Caliphates, Vahid Publication, Esfand 1348, Issue 75.

Sayyid Murtada, Ali ibn Husayn, Al-Amali, 1/94.

Mas'udi, Ali ibn Husayn, Muruj al-Dhahab, 2/224.

Najashi, Ahmad ibn Ali, ibid., 371.

Hilli, Hassan ibn Yusuf, Khulasat al-Aqwal, 15.

Najashi, Ahmad ibn Ali, ibid., 17.

Kulayni, Muhammad ibn Ya'qub, ibid., 1/515.

Kashshi, Muhammad ibn Umar, ibid., 58.

Jafariyan, Rasul, and Atlas of Shia.

Mufid, Muhammad ibn Muhammad, Al-Ikhtisas, 192; Ibid., Al-Irshad, 2/151; Dhahabi, Shams al-Din, Tarikh al-Islam, 6/438.

Ibn Shahr Ashub, Muhammad, ibid., 4/137.

Kulayni, Muhammad ibn Ya'qub, ibid., 2/20.

Kashshi, Muhammad ibn Umar, ibid., 163.

Majlisi, Muhammad Baqir, Bihar al-Anwar, 75/119; Saduq, Muhammad ibn Ali, Man La Yahduruhu al-Faqih, 1/383.

Kashshi, Muhammad ibn Umar, ibid., 164.

Arbili, Ali ibn Isa, Kashf al-Ghummah, 2/363.

Tusi, Muhammad ibn Hasan, Al-Ghaybah, 347.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-11

How to Cite

Motahari, S. M. (2024). The Role of Historical Elements in Explaining the Principle of Imamate. FOTROS Journal, 1(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12565184

Issue

Section

Articles

Categories